BTKGF
btkgf blog
Yeeeeeeeessssss?
Posts: 453
|
Post by BTKGF on Oct 11, 2007 9:03:05 GMT -5
If people truly belive that they must also believe that nothing is anything.
How can a vegtable be a vegtebal if it could be, eventualy, proven that it is not. therefore they can not belive something it is without true unequivicable evidence that can not be refuted till the end of time.
I prefer to believe, as it is far less taxing on the brain, that something is something till we get a better knowlage of what it actualy is.
Does a U.F.O. stop HAVING BEEN a U.F.O. once it is identified?
|
|
|
Post by M.Madison on Oct 11, 2007 17:17:36 GMT -5
You have no arguments from me on this... But there's a problem here... A confusion between past tense and present tense. Present statistics make past statistics null and void. I 'think' that's what the argument is. I guess the ideal is to dismiss wrong and out of date statistics and facts and learn from the new correct facts... *shrugs* don't know really, so I don't know what else we can debate when it comes to this particular subject...
|
|
BTKGF
btkgf blog
Yeeeeeeeessssss?
Posts: 453
|
Post by BTKGF on Oct 12, 2007 2:42:25 GMT -5
So it was a planet til they changed it.
On to a new subject
|
|
|
Post by M.Madison on Oct 12, 2007 9:02:11 GMT -5
agreed... This one got a little to drawn out I think
|
|
BTKGF
btkgf blog
Yeeeeeeeessssss?
Posts: 453
|
Post by BTKGF on Oct 12, 2007 9:14:28 GMT -5
We should debate that. "Is this debate too drawn out?"
|
|
|
Post by M.Madison on Oct 12, 2007 9:27:46 GMT -5
but wouldn't that draw out this debate even farther,creating only one conclution to that question. Not a very fair debate I don't think lol
|
|